Monday, May 2, 2011

No Circumcision?

It appears that there is a group of people in The San Francisco area who are working hard to have circumcision for male infants outlawed. In the first place, those who would attempt to ban circumcision have faulty excuses/defenses to do so. Circumcision has a place in civilized society. It is a portion of the covenant God made with the patriarch Abraham, thus playing a part in the creation of the great nation of ancient Israel. It is a simple medical procedure which, as stated, had religious significance. It has evolved into a procedure which has a beneficial health significance. Part of the reason the political movement in San Francisco which attempts to ban circumcision is due to the attempt to secularize society. They declare that they want to defend infants. If these people truly want to defend infants; why don't they organize themselves and fight against the evils of abortion? Abortion is evil. It is murder. It is a cancer upon our society and way of life. On the other hand: the fight against circumcision is an obvious demonstration of "phony righteousness." The proponents of this fight are wasting their time. Find something else to do to help society. Incidently, the term "male circumcision" is a faulty and reduntant term. Circumcision is only for males. Therefore no adjective is needed. I know of no "female circumcision." There is no equivalent for women regarding circumcision. It is as ridiculous as having a male "hysterectomy." Men and women are physically different. Men and women are different, therefore a man cannot have his "uterus removed." Why? Because he doesn't have one. The removal of a woman's clitoris is what is known as "female circumcision." It is practiced among Muslims. The removal of the clitoris is a monstrous, hideous, torturous, barbaric act of mutilation and mayhem. It has no place in civilized society. It is criminal conduct. Speaking of equivalence; The removal of the clitoris is equivalent to the removal of the glans of the penis. This procedure speaks for itself. Especially if one is a man.

No comments: